DAYS AND EONS - 2,600 Years of Royal Conjunctions - Elements of a World Astrology. (2).

 For an answer then look to the sky. However, the astrologers of antiquity would not have been looking for Neptune, because it was discovered only in 1846. In the view of their time, the affairs of Pisces were indicated by Jupiter to the then Lord of Sagittarius and Pisces, so they would have been looking for this one and then they would still have had to distinguish between the Pisces meaning of Jupiter and its meaning as the ruler of the sign Sagittarius.

We, on the other hand, have to look at Neptune in point of the sea, but because of its great distance, it is known that it cannot be seen with the naked eye. And until recently we were using the celestial tables, those "tables of the night", which are ephemeris (from gr. ephemeris = diary). From them we took the daily star stands. Until the computer age, ephemeris were printed, today they are available for free on the Internet for a period of 7000 years. The respective star statuses, read and recorded, lead us to the question of their evaluation and thus to the significance of the constellations.

This illustration for 'standing rhythm' shows the vibration pattern that is created when a steel plate with fine sand is set into vibration on it. I show them to give a sensual idea of what the invisible "standing" resonances look like, which wander with the Sun, the Moon and the different planets. Wherever you are currently walking through the zodiac, the 180° opposite and the two 90° corners in the zodiac are always your resonance nodes, and whenever a light / planet passes through these resonance zones, it is constant, i.e. the resonant vibrations that he goes through react with his own. Mind you, what I call 'resonances' are (so far) not physically measurable facts, but analogies of temporal correspondences and intensities. But their common 'vibration product' in turn resonates to our respective own vibrations according to our own horoscope. The result, transit constellations are physio/psychic intensities, according to the motto: the 'gods' as the founders of intensities. Here are the function-signs of structural links of the main constellations:

n

The angles of 0°, 90°, and 180° are called conjunction, opposition, and square; they are the main constellations that indicate that in the world, especially in suitable places, different world components are "swinging" into a common event. It should be noted that in astrology, in addition to these four main constellations, all possible angular positions of the stars are observed and interpreted. [2] It is experience that the ideal case of a conjunction of 0° or a square of 90°, or an opposition of 180°, is often not needed for an effect to become visible: even the run-up of a still "weak square" at an angle of say 85 ° often already acts as a constellation. This area of activity is called "orbis" and astrologers limit it to more or less 7 °, the Sun and the Moon also more. If all events were indicated solely by the current daily constellations, Venus and Neptune would be connected in one of these three main constellations in the sky above "Salamis", without ifs and buts. If we look at the daily horoscope with the planets known at that time, there is no main constellation of Venus with Jupiter to be recognized. At most, that Pisces - ruler Jupiter is in the 'city- sign' of Taurus. But this happens every 12 years for a year and is not enough as an indicator of a historical situation.

29.9.480 BC Naval battle in the Gulf of Salamis, ancient style

If you take the time from late summer to late autumn of the year as a precaution, it turns out that Venus has a clear (square) resonance with Neptune only at the beginning of November. Now the constellation according to today's fine calculations, (Moon neglected):

29.9.480 B.C. Naval battle in the Gulf of Salamis

todays style

There is no connection of Venus neither with Jupiter nor with Neptune. According to all experience, a clear picture of the sky with a direct connection of the two stars in question corresponds to such a concise state as "city on the water". But the second oracle had ended with the following words:

" Divine Salamis, you will destroy the children of women,

When the demeter grain is sown or harvested.“[4]

However - the daily constellation does not provide a compelling analogy to what is happening on Earth. Now let's try the Kingsconjunction. Here the reader will ask what one should imagine under a king conjunction. In the first chapter I go into this question in detail, so here in the introduction just so much: it is a meeting of Saturn and Jupiter, under circumstances that only occur about once every 800 years. Now if at the moment of the meeting of the two planets a snapshot of the entire solar system, as seen from the Earth, is taken, then one has the Kingsconstellation with the exact zodiac locations where the respective lights and planets, the whole heavenly society, were stored at the moment. Here is the royal constellation of - 642 BC in the Earth element, as it was authoritative until 149 AD:

and here is the transit of the day of Salamis to the Kingsconjunction, the picture is amazing: Not only does the Kingsconjunction for the 790 years of her 'reign' over the affairs of the Earth element (Northern Hemisphere) generally show the Venus / Neptune connection, but on the day (in the days) of Salamis, the ongoing current Neptune is added as a transit.

1. 11. - 642

Kingsconjunction in the earth element

Transit 29.9.-480

In the Kingsconjunction of 642 BC, Venus was at 13.6° Sagittarius 162 Years later we find Neptune in the early autumn sky of 480 BC. in his then current position: it is 12.3° Sagittarius

1. 11. - 642

Königskonjunction in the earth-element

Transit 29.9.-480 complete

Now there it is, this ascertainable "something", which, as far as I know, cannot yet be explained with previous physical hypotheses: a current celestial position necessarily enters into exactly one constellation with a celestial body of a "king conjunction" which (in this case) dates back 162 years, which corresponds to a remarkable real event on Earth to the hair. A "coincidence", in the colloquial meaning, is to be excluded if it can be proven that such "coincidences" occur repeatedly. If that were the case, how would that be possible?

To be continued,

Murnau 8. 31. 2024, UTC 20:01.